Speaker summary
⁠95%1 analyzed article/video25 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Greater St. Louis spokesperson results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 25 hits. Analysis detected 100 faulty-reasoning hits from 25 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠94% (1,693 of 28,364 speakers). This Greater St. Louis spokesperson is worse (more manipulative) than 94.00% of the peer group.
Greater St. Louis spokesperson
Speaker details
Total words: 25
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

94% percentile
025507510094.0% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos25 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 9.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos