Speaker summary
⁠76%1 analyzed article/video53 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gradek results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Authority, and Recency Bias, with Status Quo Bias as the most egregious example at 83.3% saturation with 48.722 hits. Analysis detected 163.862 faulty-reasoning hits from 53 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 51.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (8,153 of 28,364 speakers). This Gradek is worse (more manipulative) than 71.30% of the peer group.
Gradek
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 53
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

71% percentile
025507510071.3% percentile
51.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos53 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 83.3%83.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 67.3%67.3%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 44.0%44.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 44.0%44.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 16.7%16.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 83.3%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 67.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 44.0%, sitewide 11.1%Recency Bias: Speaker 44.0%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 4.6%Status Quo BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos