Speaker summary
72%3 analyzed articles/videos119 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Grace Meng results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Tu Quoque, Appeal to Emotion, and Actor-Observer Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 42.5% saturation with 93 hits. Analysis detected 403.151 faulty-reasoning hits from 119 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 21% and a BS Rank of 34% (18,757 of 28,364 speakers). This Grace Meng is better (less manipulative) than 66.10% of the peer group.
Grace Meng
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 119
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

34% percentile
025507510033.9% percentile
21.0% BS Score3 analyzed videos119 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Speaker 38.4%38.4%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Speaker 33.3%33.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 39.5%39.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 42.5%42.5%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Speaker 14.2%14.2%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 15.2%15.2%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 14.2%14.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 14.2%14.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 7.3%7.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 7.3%7.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Speaker 42.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 39.5%, sitewide 15.9%Tu Quoque: Speaker 38.4%, sitewide 0.2%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 0.1%Bandwagon: Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 2.2%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 0.6%Ad Hominem: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 5.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 1.1%Middle Ground: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 0.1%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate