Speaker summary
⁠62%1 analyzed article/video64 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Grace Jin Drexel results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 32 hits. Analysis detected 64 faulty-reasoning hits from 64 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠69% (8,835 of 28,077 speakers). This Grace Jin Drexel is worse (more manipulative) than 68.50% of the peer group.
Grace Jin Drexel
Speaker details
Total words: 64
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

69% percentile
025507510068.5% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos64 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos