Speaker summary
⁠47%1 analyzed article/video101 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gordon Osinski results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Authority, and Negativity Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 62.1% saturation with 90 hits. Analysis detected 294 faulty-reasoning hits from 101 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 33.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (13,516 of 28,364 speakers). This Gordon Osinski is worse (more manipulative) than 52.30% of the peer group.
Gordon Osinski
Speaker details
Total words: 101
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

52% percentile
025507510052.3% percentile
33.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos101 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 62.1%62.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 39.3%39.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 31.0%31.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 31.0%31.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 31.0%31.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 8.3%8.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Anecdotal: Speaker 62.1%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 39.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 31.0%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 31.0%, sitewide 19.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 31.0%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 6.0%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos