Speaker summary
⁠95%1 analyzed article/video15 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Goldman's Privorotsky results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Overconfidence Bias, and Special Pleading, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 15 hits. Analysis detected 75 faulty-reasoning hits from 15 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠95% (1,641 of 28,364 speakers). This Goldman's Privorotsky is worse (more manipulative) than 94.20% of the peer group.
Goldman's Privorotsky
Speaker details
Total words: 15
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

94% percentile
025507510094.2% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos15 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 4.6%Special Pleading: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.3%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos