Speaker summary
⁠83%1 analyzed article/video213 analyzed words
BS Summary: These GM results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Biased Writer Voice, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 43.2% saturation with 92 hits. Analysis detected 372 faulty-reasoning hits from 213 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 24.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (16,998 of 28,364 speakers). This GM is better (less manipulative) than 59.90% of the peer group.
GM
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 213
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

40% percentile
025507510040.1% percentile
24.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos213 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 43.2%43.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 34.3%34.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 31.5%31.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 21.6%21.6%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 17.4%17.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 14.1%14.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 12.7%12.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Optimism Bias: Speaker 43.2%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 34.3%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 31.5%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 21.6%, sitewide 0.8%Primacy Effect: Speaker 17.4%, sitewide 0.9%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 14.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos