Speaker summary
⁠79%1 analyzed article/video287 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gleb Kukevich results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Halo Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 58.5% saturation with 167.999 hits. Analysis detected 629.999 faulty-reasoning hits from 287 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 14.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (22,381 of 28,364 speakers). This Gleb Kukevich is better (less manipulative) than 78.90% of the peer group.
Gleb Kukevich
Speaker details
Total words: 287
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

21% percentile
025507510021.1% percentile
14.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos287 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 58.5%58.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 28.6%28.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 3.3%3.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 17.5%17.5%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Speaker 7.8%7.8%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 7.4%7.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 5.4%5.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 10.4%10.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 5.4%5.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 6.9%6.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Optimism Bias: Speaker 58.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Speaker 28.6%, sitewide 5.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Speaker 17.5%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 8.1%Composition/Division: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 0.2%In-Group Bias: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 6.9%Primacy Effect: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 0.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos