Speaker summary
⁠95%1 analyzed article/video40.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gladys Ibanez-Olea results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 40.5 hits. Analysis detected 86.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 40.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 61.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (6,881 of 28,364 speakers). This Gladys Ibanez-Olea is worse (more manipulative) than 75.70% of the peer group.
Gladys Ibanez-Olea
Speaker details
Total words: 40.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

76% percentile
025507510075.7% percentile
61.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos40.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 70.4%70.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 14.8%14.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 70.4%, sitewide 3.7%Halo Effect: Speaker 14.8%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos