Speaker summary
⁠63%1 analyzed article/video66 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Giulia Fuochi results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias and Representativeness Heuristic, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 88 hits. Analysis detected 176 faulty-reasoning hits from 66 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 66.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (5,898 of 26,730 speakers). This Giulia Fuochi is worse (more manipulative) than 77.90% of the peer group.
Giulia Fuochi
Speaker details
Total words: 66
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

78% percentile
025507510077.9% percentile
66.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos66 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 7.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos