Speaker summary
⁠63%1 analyzed article/video61.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gideon Sa’ar results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Bandwagon, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 82 hits. Analysis detected 246 faulty-reasoning hits from 61.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 60% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (7,034 of 28,364 speakers). This Gideon Sa’ar is worse (more manipulative) than 75.20% of the peer group.
Gideon Sa’ar
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠76%Gideon Sa’ar (selected)60%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 61.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

75% percentile
025507510075.2% percentile
60.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos61.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Bandwagon: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos