Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video998 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eldar Mamedov results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 33.9% saturation with 1,355 hits. Analysis detected 7,716 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,992 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠87% (898 of 6,628 authors). This Eldar Mamedov is worse (more manipulative) than 86.50% of the peer group.
Eldar Mamedov
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠87%Eldar Mamedov (selected)6%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,992
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

87% percentile
025507510086.5% percentile
5.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 33.9%33.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 10.4%10.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 16.6%16.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 16.5%16.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 8.8%8.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.2%5.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 25.1%25.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 13.4%13.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Author 33.9%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Author 16.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 25.1%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Author 16.5%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.8%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Author 13.4%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.2%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Author 10.4%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%False Dilemma: Author 7.3%, sitewide 1.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 5.9%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.9%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 2.0%Anecdotal: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%Tu Quoque: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Straw Man: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos