Speaker summary
⁠72%1 analyzed article/video57 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gerald Boudreaux results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Loss Aversion, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 81.6% saturation with 31 hits. Analysis detected 62 faulty-reasoning hits from 57 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 61.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (6,911 of 28,364 speakers). This Gerald Boudreaux is worse (more manipulative) than 75.60% of the peer group.
Gerald Boudreaux
Speaker details
Total words: 57
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

76% percentile
025507510075.6% percentile
61.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos57 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 81.6%81.6%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 40.8%40.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 81.6%, sitewide 15.9%Loss Aversion: Speaker 40.8%, sitewide 2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos