Speaker summary
⁠95%1 analyzed article/video75 analyzed words
BS Summary: These George Heppel results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Authority, and Availability Heuristic, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 100 hits. Analysis detected 300 faulty-reasoning hits from 75 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 87.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (4,920 of 28,364 speakers). This George Heppel is worse (more manipulative) than 82.70% of the peer group.
George Heppel
Speaker details
Total words: 75
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

83% percentile
025507510082.7% percentile
87.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos75 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 100.0%100.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 9.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos