Speaker summary
79%2 analyzed articles/videos514 analyzed words
BS Summary: These George Conway results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Negativity Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 18.8% saturation with 156 hits. Analysis detected 1,594.796 faulty-reasoning hits from 514 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 11.4% and a BS Rank of 15% (22,395 of 26,155 speakers). This George Conway is better (less manipulative) than 85.60% of the peer group.
George Conway

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

14% percentile
025507510014.4% percentile
11.4% BS Score2 analyzed videos514 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 26.4%26.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 21.3%21.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 15.3%15.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 11.6%11.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 16.2%16.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 18.8%18.8%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Speaker 10.1%10.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 10.9%10.9%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 10.1%10.1%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 5.8%5.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 26.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 26.4%, sitewide 1.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 24.3%, sitewide 19.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 21.3%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 20.9%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 18.8%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 16.2%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 2.2%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 0.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 1.7%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 6.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 0.4%Slippery Slope: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 5.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate