Speaker summary
65% 2 analyzed articles/videos 601.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Genevra Alberti results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Hasty Generalization , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 37.4% saturation with 328 hits . Analysis detected 1,393.031 faulty-reasoning hits from 601.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 9% and a BS Rank of 10% (24,240 of 26,730 speakers). This Genevra Alberti is better (less manipulative) than 90.70% of the peer group. Genevra Alberti
Speaker details
Total words: 601.667
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.3% percentile 9.0% BS Score2 analyzed videos601.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 40.7% 40.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 37.4% 37.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 11.0% 11.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 16.3% 16.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 1.7% 1.7% Sunk Cost Effect Sitewide 0.3% Speaker 7.1% 7.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 4.8% 4.8% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Speaker 7.1% 7.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 9.8% 9.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 40.7%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 37.4%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Speaker 11.0%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 16.3%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 7.5% Loss Aversion: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 2.5% Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 0.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 0.8% Indoctrination: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst