Speaker summary
⁠67%2 analyzed articles/videos130.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gene Hamilton results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Framing Effect, and False Dilemma, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 57.7% saturation with 124 hits. Analysis detected 500.445 faulty-reasoning hits from 130.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 26.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (16,173 of 28,364 speakers). This Gene Hamilton is better (less manipulative) than 57.00% of the peer group.
Gene Hamilton
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠43%Gene Hamilton (selected)27%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 130.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

43% percentile
025507510043.0% percentile
26.6% BS Score2 analyzed videos130.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 44.1%44.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 57.7%57.7%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 34.8%34.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 32.1%32.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 34.8%34.8%No True ScotsmanSitewide 0.1%Speaker 14.4%14.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 18.6%18.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 6.0%6.0%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 8.7%8.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 32.4%32.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 57.7%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 44.1%, sitewide 1.4%Begging the Question: Speaker 34.8%, sitewide 1.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 34.8%, sitewide 8.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 32.4%, sitewide 26.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 32.1%, sitewide 1.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 18.6%, sitewide 5.3%No True Scotsman: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 0.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 7.5%Straw Man: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos