Speaker summary
⁠43%2 analyzed articles/videos111.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gayton McKenzie results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Indoctrination, and In-Group Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 50.5% saturation with 104 hits. Analysis detected 288.557 faulty-reasoning hits from 111.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 21% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (18,772 of 28,364 speakers). This Gayton McKenzie is better (less manipulative) than 66.20% of the peer group.
Gayton McKenzie
Speaker details
Total words: 111.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

34% percentile
025507510033.8% percentile
21.0% BS Score2 analyzed videos111.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.5%50.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 22.3%22.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 25.2%25.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 12.1%12.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 11.7%11.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 13.6%13.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 11.7%11.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.5%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 25.2%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 22.3%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 19.2%In-Group Bias: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos