Speaker summary
⁠53%1 analyzed article/video50 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gary G. Perinar III results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 74 hits. Analysis detected 148 faulty-reasoning hits from 50 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 66.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (7,933 of 38,743 speakers). This Gary G. Perinar III is worse (more manipulative) than 79.50% of the peer group.
Gary G. Perinar III
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠80%Gary G. Perinar III (selected)67%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 50
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

80% percentile
025507510079.5% percentile
66.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos50 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos