Speaker summary
⁠32%2 analyzed articles/videos156.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Freedom Fuel Network results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Begging the Question, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 27.4% saturation with 78 hits. Analysis detected 290 faulty-reasoning hits from 156.5 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 12.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠18% (22,249 of 26,849 speakers). This Freedom Fuel Network is better (less manipulative) than 82.90% of the peer group.
Freedom Fuel Network
Speaker details
Total words: 156.5
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

17% percentile
025507510017.1% percentile
12.7% BS Score2 analyzed videos156.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 27.4%27.4%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 19.6%19.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 8.8%8.8%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 8.8%8.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 9.8%9.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 8.8%8.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 8.8%8.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 9.8%9.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 27.4%, sitewide 3.3%Begging the Question: Speaker 19.6%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 7.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 0.5%Bandwagon: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos