Speaker summary
⁠54%2 analyzed articles/videos290.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fredric Bauer results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Hasty Generalization, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 36.4% saturation with 118.875 hits. Analysis detected 698.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 290.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 20.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (19,197 of 28,364 speakers). This Fredric Bauer is better (less manipulative) than 67.70% of the peer group.
Fredric Bauer
Speaker details
Total words: 290.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

32% percentile
025507510032.3% percentile
20.1% BS Score2 analyzed videos290.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 36.4%36.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 34.1%34.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 27.1%27.1%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 13.8%13.8%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 13.1%13.1%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 13.8%13.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 27.1%27.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 9.2%9.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 6.9%6.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 36.4%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 34.1%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 27.1%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 27.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 0.9%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 1.4%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos