Speaker summary
⁠71%1 analyzed article/video295.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Frederick Haynes results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 28.7% saturation with 151 hits. Analysis detected 885.326 faulty-reasoning hits from 295.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 12.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠17% (23,718 of 28,364 speakers). This Frederick Haynes is better (less manipulative) than 83.60% of the peer group.
Frederick Haynes
Speaker details
Total words: 295.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

16% percentile
025507510016.4% percentile
12.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos295.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 30.8%30.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 28.6%28.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 32.1%32.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 20.6%20.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 8.2%8.2%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 8.2%8.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 12.5%12.5%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 7.6%7.6%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 8.2%8.2%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Speaker 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 32.1%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 30.8%, sitewide 8.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 30.2%, sitewide 26.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 28.6%, sitewide 6.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 20.6%, sitewide 9.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 19.2%Straw Man: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 5.3%Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 1.4%Begging the Question: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos