Speaker summary
⁠41%1 analyzed article/video44 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Frederick C. Leiner results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Authority, with Personal Incredulity as the most egregious example at 44.4% saturation with 16 hits. Analysis detected 56 faulty-reasoning hits from 44 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 27.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (15,689 of 28,364 speakers). This Frederick C. Leiner is better (less manipulative) than 55.30% of the peer group.
Frederick C. Leiner
Speaker details
Total words: 44
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

45% percentile
025507510044.7% percentile
27.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos44 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Personal IncredulitySitewide 0.2%Speaker 44.4%44.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 26.7%26.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 26.7%26.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 13.3%13.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Personal Incredulity: Speaker 44.4%, sitewide 0.2%Anecdotal: Speaker 26.7%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 26.7%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 11.1%Personal IncredulitySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos