Speaker summary
⁠59%1 analyzed article/video82 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Freddie DeBoer results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic, Begging the Question, and Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 66% saturation with 70.336 hits. Analysis detected 163.336 faulty-reasoning hits from 82 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 28.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (15,244 of 28,364 speakers). This Freddie DeBoer is better (less manipulative) than 53.70% of the peer group.
Freddie DeBoer
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠47%Freddie DeBoer (selected)29%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 82
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

46% percentile
025507510046.3% percentile
28.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos82 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 66.0%66.0%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 18.2%18.2%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 17.6%17.6%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 13.9%13.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 66.0%, sitewide 8.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 18.2%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 17.6%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 13.9%, sitewide 3.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos