Speaker summary
⁠35%1 analyzed article/video1,372.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fred Armisen results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Hasty Generalization, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 279 hits. Analysis detected 1,138.923 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,372.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠1% (28,258 of 28,364 speakers). This Fred Armisen is better (less manipulative) than 99.60% of the peer group.
Fred Armisen
Speaker details
Total words: 1,372.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

0% percentile
02550751000.4% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 2.6%2.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 13.3%13.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 3.5%3.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 2.6%2.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 2.2%2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 1.4%1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 3.7%3.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 0.9%Tu Quoque: Speaker 0.2%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos