Speaker summary
⁠58%3 analyzed articles/videos69.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Forbes Business Council results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Halo Effect, and Self-Serving Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 43.4% saturation with 38.61 hits. Analysis detected 112.88 faulty-reasoning hits from 69.333 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 38.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (12,270 of 28,364 speakers). This Forbes Business Council is worse (more manipulative) than 56.70% of the peer group.
Forbes Business Council
Speaker details
Total words: 69.333
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

57% percentile
025507510056.7% percentile
38.3% BS Score3 analyzed videos69.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 43.4%43.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 40.1%40.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 19.7%19.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 43.4%, sitewide 0.5%Halo Effect: Speaker 40.1%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 19.7%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos