Speaker summary
⁠96%1 analyzed article/video32 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Foltz results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) and Availability Heuristic, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 71.9% saturation with 23 hits. Analysis detected 55 faulty-reasoning hits from 32 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 57.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (7,389 of 28,364 speakers). This Foltz is worse (more manipulative) than 74.00% of the peer group.
Foltz
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

74% percentile
025507510074.0% percentile
57.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos32 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 71.9%71.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 71.9%71.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 28.1%28.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 71.9%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 71.9%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 28.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos