Author summary
2% 1 analyzed article/video 931 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matt Scott (Atlanta Community Press Collective) results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Hasty Generalization , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 4.7% saturation with 132 hits . Analysis detected 540 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,793 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 9% (6,065 of 6,628 authors). This Matt Scott (Atlanta Community Press Collective) is better (less manipulative) than 91.50% of the peer group. Matt Scott (Atlanta Community Press Collective)
Author details
Total words: 2,793
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.5% percentile 1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.1% 1.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.7%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst