Speaker summary
ā 70%1 analyzed article/video44 analyzed words
BS Summary: These @FLCons results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma and Framing Effect, with Bandwagon as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 24 hits. Analysis detected 70 faulty-reasoning hits from 44 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 84.4% and a BS Rank of ā 83% (5,003 of 28,364 speakers). This @FLCons is worse (more manipulative) than 82.40% of the peer group.
@FLCons
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
ā 0%The Brookings Institution1%
ā 0%Gen Jack Keane1%
ā 0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
ā 0%Mike Muse1%
ā 0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
ā 83%@FLCons (selected)85%
ā 100%4MATIV100%
ā 100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
ā 100%314 Action Fund100%
ā 100%21 Grams100%
ā 100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 44
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

82% percentile
025507510082.4% percentile
84.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos44 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0ā€“125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 76.7%76.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 76.7%76.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Bandwagon: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Speaker 76.7%, sitewide 1.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 76.7%, sitewide 26.9%BandwagonSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos