Speaker summary
⁠63%1 analyzed article/video41 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Five Eyes intelligence alliance results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 41 hits. Analysis detected 82 faulty-reasoning hits from 41 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠95% (1,461 of 28,364 speakers). This Five Eyes intelligence alliance is worse (more manipulative) than 94.90% of the peer group.
Five Eyes intelligence alliance
Speaker details
Total words: 41
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

95% percentile
025507510094.9% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos41 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos