Speaker summary
⁠81%2 analyzed articles/videos168 analyzed words
BS Summary: These FIRE results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Burden of Proof, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 61.9% saturation with 104 hits. Analysis detected 222 faulty-reasoning hits from 168 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 33% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (13,858 of 28,364 speakers). This FIRE is worse (more manipulative) than 51.10% of the peer group.
FIRE
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 168
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

51% percentile
025507510051.1% percentile
33.0% BS Score2 analyzed videos168 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 61.9%61.9%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 30.9%30.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 19.1%19.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 20.2%20.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 61.9%, sitewide 7.5%Burden of Proof: Speaker 30.9%, sitewide 0.4%Framing Effect: Speaker 20.2%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 19.1%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos