Speaker summary
⁠96%1 analyzed article/video29 analyzed words
BS Summary: These FIFA disciplinary committee results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice and Burden of Proof, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 29 hits. Analysis detected 87 faulty-reasoning hits from 29 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠95% (1,392 of 26,891 speakers). This FIFA disciplinary committee is worse (more manipulative) than 94.80% of the peer group.
FIFA disciplinary committee
Speaker details
Total words: 29
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

95% percentile
025507510094.8% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos29 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.3%Burden of Proof: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos