Speaker summary
⁠38%1 analyzed article/video49.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These FHP results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Primacy Effect, Negativity Bias, and Recency Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 27.3% saturation with 18 hits. Analysis detected 66 faulty-reasoning hits from 49.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 25% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (16,856 of 28,364 speakers). This FHP is better (less manipulative) than 59.40% of the peer group.
FHP
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 49.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

41% percentile
025507510040.6% percentile
25.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos49.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 27.3%27.3%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 22.7%22.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 27.3%27.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 22.7%22.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 27.3%, sitewide 11.1%Primacy Effect: Speaker 27.3%, sitewide 0.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 22.7%, sitewide 19.2%Recency Bias: Speaker 22.7%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos