Author summary
5%2 analyzed articles/videos208 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lindsey Gimbert results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Biased Writer Voice, and Blind-Spot Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 56 hits. Analysis detected 246 faulty-reasoning hits from 624 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 65% (2,330 of 6,629 authors). This Lindsey Gimbert is worse (more manipulative) than 64.90% of the peer group.
Lindsey Gimbert
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
65%Lindsey Gimbert (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 624
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

65% percentile
025507510064.9% percentile
3.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles624 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.0%9.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 6.7%6.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.6%2.6%Blind-Spot BiasSitewide 0.2%Author 2.9%2.9%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Author 2.9%2.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 1.9%1.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 6.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.8%, sitewide 5.3%Blind-Spot Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.2%Primacy Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.9%Recency Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos