Speaker summary
⁠79%2 analyzed articles/videos404.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fernando Mateo results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Availability Heuristic, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 26.5% saturation with 107.371 hits. Analysis detected 884.333 faulty-reasoning hits from 404.5 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠8% (26,126 of 28,364 speakers). This Fernando Mateo is better (less manipulative) than 92.10% of the peer group.
Fernando Mateo
Speaker details
Total words: 404.5
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

8% percentile
02550751007.9% percentile
8.3% BS Score2 analyzed videos404.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 6.9%6.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 24.7%24.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 26.5%26.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 18.0%18.0%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 10.2%10.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 9.0%9.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 12.3%12.3%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 9.3%9.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 7.0%7.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 7.0%7.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 26.5%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 24.7%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 18.0%, sitewide 9.1%Loss Aversion: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 2.5%Recency Bias: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 0.5%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 4.6%In-Group Bias: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 1.4%False Dilemma: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos