Speaker summary
⁠63%1 analyzed article/video28 analyzed words
BS Summary: These federal investigators results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias and Negativity Bias, with Burden of Proof as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 14 hits. Analysis detected 42 faulty-reasoning hits from 28 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠69% (8,817 of 28,364 speakers). This federal investigators is worse (more manipulative) than 68.90% of the peer group.
federal investigators
Speaker details
Total words: 28
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

69% percentile
025507510068.9% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos28 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Burden of Proof: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.4%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Burden of ProofSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos