Speaker summary
⁠96%1 analyzed article/video34 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Department of Justice results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 34 hits. Analysis detected 136 faulty-reasoning hits from 34 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠95% (1,420 of 28,364 speakers). This Federal Department of Justice is worse (more manipulative) than 95.00% of the peer group.
Federal Department of Justice
Speaker details
Total words: 34
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

95% percentile
025507510095.0% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos34 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos