Speaker summary
⁠49%1 analyzed article/video552.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fatimah Jackson results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Hasty Generalization, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 108 hits. Analysis detected 768.162 faulty-reasoning hits from 552.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠3% (27,671 of 28,364 speakers). This Fatimah Jackson is better (less manipulative) than 97.60% of the peer group.
Fatimah Jackson
Speaker details
Total words: 552.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

2% percentile
02550751002.4% percentile
4.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos552.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 4.0%4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 13.4%13.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 6.6%6.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 12.6%12.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 4.0%4.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 5.3%5.3%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 5.1%5.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 12.4%12.4%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 13.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 12.6%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 12.4%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 1.4%Recency Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 2.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos