Speaker summary
ā 38%1 analyzed article/video66 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fariha Abbasi-Feinberg results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 44 hits. Analysis detected 176 faulty-reasoning hits from 66 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ā 69% (8,812 of 28,364 speakers). This Fariha Abbasi-Feinberg is worse (more manipulative) than 68.90% of the peer group.
Fariha Abbasi-Feinberg
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
ā 0%The Brookings Institution1%
ā 0%Gen Jack Keane1%
ā 0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
ā 0%Mike Muse1%
ā 0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
ā 69%Fariha Abbasi-Feinberg (selected)50%
ā 100%4MATIV100%
ā 100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
ā 100%314 Action Fund100%
ā 100%21 Grams100%
ā 100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 66
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

69% percentile
025507510068.9% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos66 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0ā€“75%
0.0%20%40%60%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos