Speaker summary
⁠96%1 analyzed article/video71 analyzed words
BS Summary: These F3 Innovate results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Confirmation Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 71 hits. Analysis detected 213 faulty-reasoning hits from 71 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 75% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (5,400 of 28,364 speakers). This F3 Innovate is worse (more manipulative) than 81.00% of the peer group.
F3 Innovate
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 71
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

81% percentile
025507510081.0% percentile
75.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos71 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 66.2%66.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 33.8%33.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.5%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 66.2%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 33.8%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos