Speaker summary
⁠82%1 analyzed article/video148 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Everett Plummer results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Burden of Proof, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 73.4% saturation with 125.069 hits. Analysis detected 555.903 faulty-reasoning hits from 148 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 35.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (13,013 of 28,364 speakers). This Everett Plummer is worse (more manipulative) than 54.10% of the peer group.
Everett Plummer
Speaker details
Total words: 148
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

54% percentile
025507510054.1% percentile
35.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos148 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 78.6%78.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 73.3%73.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 66.6%66.6%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 47.5%47.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 34.0%34.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 9.2%9.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 6.0%6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 78.6%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 73.3%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 66.6%, sitewide 19.2%Burden of Proof: Speaker 47.5%, sitewide 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 34.0%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution ErrorSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos