Speaker summary
⁠79%2 analyzed articles/videos365.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Everett Kelley results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 36.1% saturation with 176 hits. Analysis detected 975.935 faulty-reasoning hits from 365.5 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 11% and a BS Rank of ⁠14% (24,517 of 28,364 speakers). This Everett Kelley is better (less manipulative) than 86.40% of the peer group.
Everett Kelley
Speaker details
Total words: 365.5
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

14% percentile
025507510013.6% percentile
11.0% BS Score2 analyzed videos365.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 27.8%27.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 11.5%11.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 11.5%11.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 9.8%9.8%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 11.5%11.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 28.4%28.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 36.1%36.1%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 11.3%11.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 19.6%19.6%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 9.8%9.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 36.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 28.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 27.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 19.6%, sitewide 11.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 11.5%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 11.5%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 11.5%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 2.0%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Horn Effect: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 1.0%In-Group Bias: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 6.9%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 2.5%Burden of Proof: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 0.4%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Primacy Effect: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 0.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 2.2%Middle Ground: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos