Speaker summary
⁠72%1 analyzed article/video250.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Evelynn Ellis results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Hasty Generalization, and Straw Man, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 56 hits. Analysis detected 511.413 faulty-reasoning hits from 250.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠13% (24,863 of 28,364 speakers). This Evelynn Ellis is better (less manipulative) than 87.70% of the peer group.
Evelynn Ellis
Speaker details
Total words: 250.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

12% percentile
025507510012.3% percentile
10.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos250.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 21.0%21.0%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 19.0%19.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 18.4%18.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 4.4%4.4%No True ScotsmanSitewide 0.1%Speaker 8.4%8.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 8.8%8.8%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 7.6%7.6%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 8.4%8.4%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 8.4%8.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 12.8%12.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Indoctrination: Speaker 21.0%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 19.2%Straw Man: Speaker 19.0%, sitewide 0.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 18.4%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 16.3%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 9.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 0.8%Anecdotal: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 1.5%No True Scotsman: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 0.1%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 0.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 3.3%Composition/Division: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 0.2%IndoctrinationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos