Speaker summary
⁠38%1 analyzed article/video408.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eureka Police Department results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Representativeness Heuristic, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 52.566 hits. Analysis detected 271.566 faulty-reasoning hits from 408.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠2% (28,006 of 28,364 speakers). This Eureka Police Department is better (less manipulative) than 98.70% of the peer group.
Eureka Police Department
Speaker details
Total words: 408.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

1% percentile
02550751001.3% percentile
3.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos408.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 4.8%4.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 12.9%12.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 2.9%2.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 2.7%2.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 2.9%2.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 3.8%3.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 2.7%2.7%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 4.0%4.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 19.2%Indoctrination: Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 5.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 2.5%Begging the Question: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos