Speaker summary
⁠76%3 analyzed articles/videos63.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Erwin Chemerinsky results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Hasty Generalization, and False Dilemma, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 45.5% saturation with 34.125 hits. Analysis detected 146.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 63.667 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 43.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (11,150 of 28,364 speakers). This Erwin Chemerinsky is worse (more manipulative) than 60.70% of the peer group.
Erwin Chemerinsky
Speaker details
Total words: 63.667
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

61% percentile
025507510060.7% percentile
43.4% BS Score3 analyzed videos63.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 45.5%45.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 37.5%37.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 34.0%34.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%False Dilemma: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 45.5%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 37.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 34.0%, sitewide 7.5%False DilemmaSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos