Speaker summary
⁠83%1 analyzed article/video44 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Erin Zalinski results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Slippery Slope, and Loss Aversion, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 86% saturation with 37.854 hits. Analysis detected 155.854 faulty-reasoning hits from 44 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 42.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (11,326 of 28,364 speakers). This Erin Zalinski is worse (more manipulative) than 60.10% of the peer group.
Erin Zalinski
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠61%Erin Zalinski (selected)43%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 44
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

60% percentile
025507510060.1% percentile
42.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos44 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 86.0%86.0%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 48.6%48.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 48.6%48.6%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 31.4%31.4%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 20.0%20.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 20.0%20.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 86.0%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 48.6%, sitewide 6.9%Slippery Slope: Speaker 48.6%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Speaker 31.4%, sitewide 2.5%Begging the Question: Speaker 20.0%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 20.0%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos