Speaker summary
58% 1 analyzed article/video 168 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Erin Murphy results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma , Appeal to Emotion , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.5% saturation with 64 hits . Analysis detected 338.125 faulty-reasoning hits from 168 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 15.2% and a BS Rank of 23% (21,913 of 28,364 speakers). This Erin Murphy is better (less manipulative) than 77.30% of the peer group. Erin Murphy
Speaker details
Total words: 168
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.7% percentile 15.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos168 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 32.8% 32.8% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 12.5% 12.5% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 12.9% 12.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 7.3% 7.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 11.0% 11.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 23.5% 23.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 12.9% 12.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 11.0% 11.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 12.9% 12.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% False Dilemma: Speaker 32.8%, sitewide 1.5% Negativity Bias: Speaker 23.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 9.1% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 0.8% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 11.0%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 11.0%, sitewide 7.5% Indoctrination: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst