Speaker summary
⁠33%2 analyzed articles/videos251.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Erika Evans results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 17.3% saturation with 78 hits. Analysis detected 365.354 faulty-reasoning hits from 251.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠8% (26,132 of 28,364 speakers). This Erika Evans is better (less manipulative) than 92.10% of the peer group.
Erika Evans
Speaker details
Total words: 251.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

8% percentile
02550751007.9% percentile
8.3% BS Score2 analyzed videos251.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 11.3%11.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 17.3%17.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 9.5%9.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 5.3%5.3%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 4.4%4.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 12.4%12.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 5.7%5.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 4.7%4.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 4.7%4.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 7.7%7.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 19.2%Anecdotal: Speaker 17.3%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 12.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 3.7%Burden of Proof: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos