Speaker summary
⁠96%2 analyzed articles/videos145 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Erika Andiola results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and In-Group Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 52.5% saturation with 76.146 hits. Analysis detected 437.43 faulty-reasoning hits from 145 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 25% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (16,804 of 28,364 speakers). This Erika Andiola is better (less manipulative) than 59.20% of the peer group.
Erika Andiola
Speaker details
Total words: 145
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

41% percentile
025507510040.8% percentile
25.0% BS Score2 analyzed videos145 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 48.1%48.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 52.5%52.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 29.3%29.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 32.9%32.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 13.5%13.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 13.5%13.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 13.5%13.5%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 13.5%13.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 19.8%19.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 13.5%13.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 52.5%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 48.1%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 32.9%, sitewide 19.2%In-Group Bias: Speaker 29.3%, sitewide 6.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 26.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 19.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos