Speaker summary
⁠46%1 analyzed article/video114.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eric Valenzuela results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Halo Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 19.9% saturation with 33 hits. Analysis detected 142.24 faulty-reasoning hits from 114.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 15.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠24% (21,751 of 28,364 speakers). This Eric Valenzuela is better (less manipulative) than 76.70% of the peer group.
Eric Valenzuela
Speaker details
Total words: 114.5
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

23% percentile
025507510023.3% percentile
15.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos114.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 23.8%23.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 19.9%19.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 19.9%19.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 11.4%11.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 11.4%11.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 6.6%6.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Halo Effect: Speaker 23.8%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 19.9%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 19.9%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 11.4%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 11.4%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 11.1%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos